I think that what we have to remember is that diffractive multifocal lenses have been available for 20 years, with a typical energy loss of approximately 20%. If we compare this to 7% (with the Mplus), the difference is not the 14% or 15% we showed in our study—the difference is a 66% less loss of energy. I think if you look at it from this perspective, then you can understand the big difference between this and other multifocal IOLs.
Prof. Dr. Gerd U. Auffarth, MD, PhD
The Oculentis LENTIS Comfort lens has provided my patients with high levels of satisfaction due to the spectacle independence, clarity, contrast sensitivity and the lack of glare and halos. My patients have freedom from glasses for their functional tasks, especially when combined with mini-monovision, achieving good distance, intermediate and near vision.
Dr. Karim Punja, MD, FRSC
With more than 95% light transmission, the Comfort can be implanted confidently and results in great distance and intermediate vision with functional near vision and very few complaints compared to the competition.
Francis Roy, MD, FRSC
Three years ago I would have only considered a monofocal lens for my own eyes, but if I was considering surgery right now this is the lens I would have myself.
Julian Stevens, MD
Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon, Moorfield Eye Hospital, UK, 2013.
My results were so good that I moved to implanting only this lens, without particular discrimination in terms of patient selection.
Prof. Dr. Jorge L. Alió, MD, PHD
I use the Comfort IOL because it gives my patients a good quality range and clarity of vision without glare or halos. My results are consistent, and I am confident when recommending this lens to my patients.
Dr. El-Karim Rhemtulla, MD, FRSC
Chief of Ophthalmology Niagara Health